(photo of beautiful card created by Rachel Fenton)There has been a lot of discussion around the blogosphere about how feminists represent their views in the way they dress. Although no one invited me to participate, as I am not much of a fashion or feminist blogger (just a little bit of both, I guess), I am very interested in the topic and I did follow it closely, and I have been pondering over my own response.
I do enjoy what is considered feminine clothing, like dresses and skirts, lace, embroidery and flowery prints. However, I always wear loose, flowy clothes. If some article of clothing makes me feel self-conscious or requires too much of my attention (like too low pants or too deep cleavage), they are not for me. I value my freedom of movement. I value clothes that feel soft and comfortable and do not restrict my body or my spirit. This is my perspective on feminist clothing. If it is restrictive in any way, it has to go. I do not see clothes as only utilitarian, I do appreciate their aesthetic value, but I do not embrace their socially acceptable (punitive?) transformative value. I do not want to "celebrate my feminine shapes" by trying to look slimmer, taller, more hourglasslike. I would rather not wear stilettos and body-shaping undergarments (although I will not throw away the bra). If some piece of clothing hurts in any way, it is not worth it. Life is painful enough as it is, and there are many other things that are worth suffering for. Clothing is not among those things. In Romania there is a saying that you have to suffer for beauty. I disagree. It is not beauty, if it hurts. It is just a manufactured idea of beauty. We are natural beings. Beautiful enough.
I have also realized that I have been rejecting my attraction to pink, because, you know, it is such a "girly color." Which it is. I know there have been studies done on the subject, but I have also been following my daughter's tastes in clothing and colors and I can tell that is it not a learned behavior, it is innate. She just likes pink. And I think I like it too. I think I should not feel embarrassed about it anymore. It will be a feminist statement, like it's been for women's groups all over the world, like the Pink Gang in India and the Code Pink in the U.S.
A third aspect of clothing that means a lot to me is the fabric -- it has to be natural. My most favorite fabric is linen. I like the irregular look of it, the feel, the wrinkles. Everything about it. But if it is not linen, it has to be cotton, wool or silk. Polyester makes me sick. I cannot touch it, I don't want to see it, I cannot have it in my house. I know there are advantages of synthetic fibers, like ease of cleaning and durability, but they are not worth it. They feel horribly on your skin and they take a big toll on the environment. I think we should try to get closer to nature, to our nature, as much as we can, and this is a concern that women share, more than men. Not to mention that women, the most vulnerable of the world's poor, are more seriously affected by climate changes and environmental toxicity.
Many other bloggers have shared how their clothes represent their feminist views, and I enjoyed the elegance with which they tried to demonstrate that there is no feminist uniform and that we each interpret our clothes and political views differently. Our clothes speak our message, although in different ways, and the important thing is that a lot is being said.
10 comments:
Why did google not tell me about this?! I did a double take at the picture!
I think all women should feel empowered to wear what they like and I don't think they should be embarrassed by their bodies - whatever shape they may be. I love all kinds of garment, whether structured/tailored, loose and flowing, baggy and shapeless, whatever - I choose as my mood takes me. I love linen and cotton and ntural fabrics, too, but I know this is no guarantee that the environment isn't being damaged. I guess we could all be more responsible when we shop in general, and not just for clothes. I'm experimenting with patchwork - large pieces I've salvaged from my worn out clothes - I'm thinking of making something long and fluid...we'll see - it should be an organic process - a lot like life itself.
This is a really great post, Lori - and it's wonderful to hear YOUR voice so clearly through your words. I dunno, but it seems like you're waking up from a long sleep.
Thanks, Rachel. I wish I felt like I was awake. Maybe someday.
I hope you'll show us the result of your patchwork project. I think it's a brilliant idea. My daughter had a patchwork dress that she wouldn't stop wearing. I have a bit of OCD so I worry about everything that could go wrong with such a project. So many imperfections that I would loose sleep over...
And I also agree that buying natural fibers might not do much to help the environment in the short run. It does help me though to feel less of a plastic, man-made being. And in the long run, it's true that we first need to consume less and with more awareness if we want to change anything.
I really enjoyed reading this. It's a question I've been pondering since I was in my teens and wrote my honors thesis about women in art--do we want to be the viewer or the viewed? But ultimately I decided that innate within women is the desire to be desirable, not to say that it's admirable or any more planned than an attraction to the color pink. It's such a fascinating topic. As a designer I just want to make clothes that are comfortable and make women look beautiful. I hadn't really thought of it from a feminist perspective, but it's good food for thought!
xo Mary Jo
Thank you for stopping by my blog, Mary Jo. I'm thinking about it. It's very intriguing. Women do like to be admired and desired. But they do have that in common with men, right? Men also love to receive compliments. Only I feel that they don't value as much compliments about the way they look. Because they allow themselves to look old, fat and slobby and still feel worthy of being desired. Women, on the other hand, through I don't know who's fault, need to be perfect to feel desirable. And perfection takes such a toll on us. Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts.
Elegance is also a state of being....even in rags one can look beautiful...though, the choices of how one dresses reveals who they are or hides who they are...whichever way the person has decided to use clothings, clothings are a sort of second skin.
Buttoned or unbuttoned ;-)
I am very familiar with that Romanian saying. My mother has drummed it into my head from a very young age. And, oddly enough, I am surrounded by people who really believe it.
I whole-heartedly agree. True feminism is having the right to be a girl, not the right to reject being feminine -- which is where it can go sometimes and I think that's a shame. After all, it's supposed to be about freedom and equality, and what is freeing or equal about rejecting all the things you really love because they are girly? Shouldn't it be about celebrating the things YOU love, not the things that are forced on you.
I love pink and I'd wear it more if I could find more of it!
I loved this line, too. "It is not beauty, if it hurts." Darn right! I wish women everywhere would listen to those words and believe in them.
PS: that card is stunning!
~* I often think of clothes as a second skin, Cole. I like that.
~* I know, Angie. It is very popular in Romania, isn't it? And very acceptable.
~* I completely agree with everything you say, Wen. That is exactly my point -- only you make it better.
Comfort above all, yes!
With regard to pink, I think it's a matter of concept vs. actual shade of color.
I have noticed in myself and in others that we don't reject any particular shade located somewhere between red, violet, and white, we just reject the concept of pink as a color-coding for femininity. I remember my self-declared pink-hating tomboy roommate asking me, on an occasion where she wanted to wear a salmon-colored shirt: "I really like it - -- But... is it pink? If it's pink I cannot wear it!".
I've recently noticed that I'm drawn to pink-ish shades for their color value alone, and I've decided to reclaim them! I wouldn't want to say there's an innate preference for pink in women, though. Maybe there's a general preference in humans for these shades - after all, pink-ish and reddish hues signal health (rosy cheeks, lips, etc.) and often occur in ripe fruits, so that could have made sense in the course of evolution, but any preference for or rejection of the concept of pink must be culturally conditioned, because the concept as such is a product of culture.
Thanks for your honest opinion. You made a great point about how we should be striving to use more natural fabric, which I haven't thought of before. It's interesting that we women seem to have a complicated relationship with the colour pink as well, because we've been conditioned to love it unconditionally. I agree with poet that pink has very positive connotations of health. As one of the Feminist Fashion Bloggers pointed out, that's why pink used to be deemed as a man's colour in the past centuries because it signified virility and strength. It's interesting to see how culture evolves, and how it also naturalizes these socially conditioned preferences as innate as well.
Post a Comment
Thank you for sharing your thoughts.